* I’m still trying to decide if this would be awesome or horrifying: what if, instead of billions of microscopic guys, sperm came out as one big one? Like, say, three inches long? Masturbation could only be enhanced by the possibility of a gladiatorial finale; blowjobs maybe not so much.
What if the thing could bark?
* What is language to an individual? I started musing about the evidence that a second language learned in adulthood is handled differently by the brain than is a second language (or a primary one, for that matter) learned in childhood, and then started kicking around the well-known fact that a language (especially/particularly a second one? I don’t know) that isn’t used can be forgotten by the user. The next question, for me, was: if you only know one language and you don’t use it, can you lose it? Be left language-less? My hunchy answer is ‘no.’ I think silly things, like someone talking to themself while doing a solitary job, point to the fact that language isn’t entirely about communication. There are two key elements of your standard dictionary definition of language: communication, and the use of arbitrary symbols to encode information. I think the second part of this is where my answer starts. The question has to become: can there be anything that we would recognize as ‘thought’ without language? Is there a machine language (haha) for the brain? I suppose Sapir and Whorf would have something to say about it, but not much (obviously the language one uses, with its unique collection of metaphor and rhymes and so forth, would influence the way one looks at the world, but since the language is still a symbolic construct regardless, saying that it affects thought after the fact doesn’t tell us much about thought BEFORE the language is obtained.) I’m so running this one by the Doctors Beatty.
* As a recent initiate to the twilight times, I realize I’m not the first person to visit. I realize that there are any number of people of various genders, ages and cultures who claim this area, as with any other. But I need you to do me a favor: whatever bizarre physical ritual you engage in when there aren’t many people around, I really need you to explain it to me so that I know it isn’t the astonishingly obscene act that it appears to be. I’m simply not up to the task of rationalizing what I’m seeing. I’d like to able to say ‘Oh, that’s Betty - she’s praying’ or ’she’s got The Trembles and that’s a therapeutic exercise.’ All you’re giving me is ‘that’s Betty. She thinks that it if she masturbates violently enough, world peace will happen.’
* I realize that what we theorize and what happens in the world are light years apart, and that thoughts don’t change anything on their own, but how is it not blindingly obvious that when we act violently it is a perversion of what we are? As far as we know, we are the only species that can apprehend its own mortality, that can think abstractly and that can communicate those thoughts. These are things that make us human - if we choose not to use them, we choose to be less than we are.